DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
awa fru wwwnak aan af Boorse
Re : neving aWweo & € =
rel 2 5 Lu e Ne G2 Gltes anc US C Wwe
& Ber Pe one? at
administrative exis law ana reguic ns
within the Department of the Navy .
iTice aving
z Ss mel
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration
especially in light of the co Board finds
the existence of an injustice warr 7 the lowing partia:
corrective action
Docket No. NR7265- 14
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:
s. Upon rarelovlation PMA points nrewiouely earned will advance
Petitioner against cycie 34, uve. the. Meee BAavratian and Training
professional Development and Technology Center (NETPDTC) will enter
PNA points and determine Petitioner's advancement date.
action
b. That part of the Petitioner's request for corrective
Records show that the
that exceeds the foregoing is denied.
Petitioner Petitioner's cycle 223 Navy Wide Advancement Examination
(NWAE) was graded against cycle 219 and 220. However, Petitioner
passed not advanced (PNA) cycle 219 and 220.
c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
orum was present at revi a
rue and complete record of
4. It is certified that qu
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a t
rhe Board's proceedings in the above entieies neeyer
/ fet
rt t } 4444 7 _ me 7 = , - - i a + - i = ve.
y a * oy esha y -'}) Ph pe . Ar =
(a), hae been approvec by the Boat
Navy.
28 Jan 15
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2970 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her Performance Mark Average (PMA) for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle 212 should have been 3.8 vice 3.7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7581 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100; ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket Ne NR7581-14 24 Mar 5 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Recoras To ; Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO W NPC memo 1430 (3) Subject’s naval record da Pursuant referred to requesting, i ect ; to update cycle 219 Profile Sheet . b. Petitioner's Final Multiple Score (FMS) is changed to reflect 191 15 vice 187.15. c. That part of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9345 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket C I -14 26 Mar E From Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO = o at ct » a aD 3 O 5 ct ya Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) NPC memo 14 ) Subject’s naval record a) 1. NR9345-14 RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner was administered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06079-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate her E-6/YN1 Navy-wide advancement examinations and show that that her E-6/YN1 examinations from September 2008 through September 2010 be validated and receive PNA points to be applied to her March 2011 exam. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10262 11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 June 2012 and, pursuant to 4ts regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be teken on the available evidence of record. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. VOZ62-12 that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00712-11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. Upon being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status in December 2010, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. He had advanced...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07085-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. In September 2010, with his final adjudicated clearance, he participated in the E6/AE1 Navy-wide advancement examination and was selected and advanced with an effective date of 16 June 2011. j. Petitioner has applied to this Board seeking to have his E6/AE1 advancement exams validated retroactively for PNA points to apply toward his September 2009 advancement exam. NPC and CNO...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6791 14
gsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and {3}, the Docket No.NR6791-14 Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. 22...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10656 11
Under BUPERINST 1430.16F, (Advancement Manual for Enlisted Personnel of the U.S. Navy and U.S. Navy Reserve), all personnel designated in certain ratings, including Petitioner’s rating, “must maintain, as a minimum, continuous security clearance eligibility.” This provision has been interpreted by NPC to mean that, in order to be eligible to participate in an advancement cycle, take an advancement exam or advance to the next highest grade, a Sailor in one of the designated ratings must hold...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11272 11
g. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. He had never been held back in any way from progressing through his Navy career due to security clearance issues and he was not aware that there was a deficiency that would disqualify him from competing for advancement. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in...